The Deep Shades Of The Being Ruled By The Immensity Of Judgment

Center your understanding on creative reason, experiencing that expansion of self-perception that does not involve a division of the self.

The evolution of my science was possible only through a double and continuous back and forth movement, like a balance between the harsh reality beyond appearances and the imaginative projection of unclarified conjunctures, imposed by steps towards a time of rediscovering my identity, in which there was no space and no matter, but only a benchmark for the readjustments of the minuses and pluses of my knowledge.

It was a kind of transition from subjectivity to objectivity, and vice versa, from objectivity to subjectivity. It was a complicated process of removing my limits, opening new perspectives for understanding and relating to my own person.

But in this forward and return movement to a point of maximum expansion of my own conscience, the speed of connections shutter with new status entities varied in time in a predetermined manner. I felt somehow trapped in my own person, as if I had abandoned myself to a beautiful delirium, going from derisory to immensity, blurring my reason to react against a domination refusing to determine. Maybe I should have tried to push reason beyond itself.

Have you become part of a finite virtue acquired by refusing to place yourself in the service of a rule that refuses to determine itself?

Undoubtedly, I became particularly skilful in formulating ambiguities between reality and imaginary, relying on depth effects of creations stemming from self-revelations, necessary for life experience and leadership, in those difficult battles between the infinite and the finite, between reality and conscience.

The infinite that encompassed my essence, with all its lights and shadows, which became a purely relative judgment, and the finite of a significant life, that filled in an inspired manner the gap of thoughts, contrary to the conditions of a scientific capital reallocation, with new depth shades, which highlighted my real personality.

Great science, as part of some sort of human connection to the outside, namely with his surroundings, against creation of facts, but also spiritual fruitfulness, is also defined by a series of other elements. First of all, it is a system of comprehension of a higher self-consciousness, which is hard to influence and accessible only to a limited part of humanity, only to insiders, as it can’t be "cloned" to an industrial scale in order to be plentiful.

Does your sense of life’s continuity and unity deepen as you embrace your own identity as an active process of inner self-definition, capable of counteracting the chance hidden behind an apparent occurrence?

At the same time, great knowledge supports your reason in resisting a form of domination that refuses to become clear. This domination arises from the ambiguous interpretation of your own identity. This foreign force keeps you captive within an innovative mode of thought, detached from material aspects and directed only toward self-knowledge, not toward the knowledge of humankind and the world.

Rejecting this force requires a conscious effort, a kind of contribution to a particular virtue. This is the virtue of finitude: moderation in relation to knowledge and to that movement of advancing toward and returning from perfection. Identity is an active process, both affective and cognitive, through which you represent yourself in the world despite chance. It comes with a sense of permanence that makes your life seem continuous, unified, and original.

The evolution of your personality becomes possible only if you limit the excessive accumulation of knowledge and understand that the idea of ​​a supreme reason can only be a projection of your own imagination.

Striving to achieve perfection turns man into an automaton, slave of a mechanism with unlimited existence in terms of generating new scientific foundations, built around a higher reason, admitting that lengthy improper conduct to make something forceful, somewhat artificially, into a life of compromise and sacrifice. This effort violates the basic principle of moderation: abstain yourself from the excessive consumption of science.

The great writer Paulo Coelho was right when he said: "Stop being who you were and turn into who you are". If your scientific development becomes possible only through a double back and forth movement, like a balance between the harsh reality beyond appearances and your imaginative projection of the conjuncture of life, you get to turn, paradoxically, into a "marginal" for others.

Can the complexity of your creative power erase the way others perceive you, if you turn toward the world of science at the expense of life itself?

The marginal, the duplicated man belongs to two worlds, of science and life – but he tends more towards the first one. This gives the complexity and richness of unlimited creative power. Basically, such an individual deletes any question about himself, for inside him there is no space, nor matter, but only variable effects of transition from subjectivity to objectivity, and vice versa, from objectivity to subjectivity.

The marginal is a source of unique and very valuable intellectual income, continuously feeding with creative power, but not with spiritual power, hovering outside the moral scale, leaving social manners.

If you want your leadership not to get caught in a two-fronts war, of self and selfishness, give the opportunity to your science to build around the creative reason, experiencing that expansion of perception of yourself that does not precede duplication.

Self-duplication expresses the attempt to magnify your worth through an excess of knowledge, in the absence of any authentic renewal in the way you relate to reality. It names the tension between who you are and who you would like to be, ultimately resulting in an identity emptied of reality.

The deep shades of the being ruled by the immensity of judgment concerns that perfection of self-knowledge, coupled with the real "MySelf", and the possibilities for action in an ever-changing external environment regarding aspects of human factor.