Neculai Fantanaru

Everything Depends On The Leader

The Principle Of Self Exclusion

On January 20, 2010
, in
Leadership Principles by Neculai Fantanaru

When a leader is undecided, his indecision will cause his own exclusion from the race.

An undecided person isn't fated to achieve excellence in leadership so easily. An exaltation, an impulse can blow the person up, like a rocket, beyond his own limits, but if he's not meant to reach the top of the pyramid and to settle himself to that particular level, if he lacks strong character features, such as self-confidence, volition or will, then his attempts will turn out to be, beyond doubt, doomed.

I realized this truth, that there are some who aren't meant to succeed in their attempts because of their indecision, after having watched the movie "Vertical limit (2000)" . If you are going to watch it yourself, I'm sure you'll agree with me.

Tom McClaren, an exceptional alpinist, is appointed to lead an expedition on the K2 Mountain of the Himalayas. He has a great responsibility: he must lead the billionaire Elliot Vaughn and Annie, a famous alpinist, to the peak. At first, the weather was wonderful, the sun rose bright and shining, there was little wind. At a given point, Tom is contacted by the ground base and warned about the change of weather. He thinks, for a moment, to abandon his mission. But because there was a chance of 70% for the wind to change its direction and, especially, because of Annie's and Elliot's insistences, he decides to carry on climbing.

Leadership: Is your condemnation the consequence of the final confrontation between what you are committed to doing and what others do not know that you truly are?

When they reach 7800 meters, Tom is once again contacted by the ground base, but this time he's announced of a strong storm getting close to them and he's asked to immediately abandon the climb and go back. Tom seems to forebode a great catastrophe. But he hesitates to take a firm decision. Elliot challenges him to carry on with the climb; otherwise he would fall into contempt and would live his entire life ashamed. And Tom, being obedient, submitted to him.

The three carried on together with their journey. As expected, the storm rises and they get caught in a cave covered by an avalanche. Tom is severely wounded. After only a few hours, he falls ill, as Annie herself, because of pulmonary edema. with pulmonary edema. His only chance to survive was to inject himself dextrose. But there weren't enough shots. And Elliot knew that it wouldn't take much longer for him to fall ill, as well.

The following scene is memorable. Tom makes Elliot responsible for everything that has happened: "We wouldn't be here if it weren't for you". And then Elliot reminds him: "You were the leader, Tom".

In the end, Tom is killed by Elliot, the man who suggested to carry on climbing, but whom he should have never had to listen to.

Leadership is a situation of the "You or Them" type in which you will have the advantage, because you are the one who has the right to make compromises, because you are both the one who acts and the one who bears the action.

Failure at high altitude. Let's be honest and admit, Tom lacked in virtues of a leader. He should have lead, and Annie and Elliot should have followed him. Instead, things went backwards. Elliot and Annie, but especially Elliot, lead him in their direction and finally, unfortunately, towards death.

Actually, Tom's main mistake was indecision. He hesitated when he should have taken a firm attitude. Instead of listening to his instinct, instead of imposing his authority as a leader, he followed Elliot. And when a leader is undecided, his hesitation will cause his own exclusion from the race. This is what I called "The principle of self-exclusion".

Tom succeeded in sabotaging himself through his hesitation and indecision. As a leader, he was authorized and had the responsibility to lead Annie and Elliot to the top, to give them absolute confidence by guarding them against danger. He should have had the final word, he should have decided if they could carry on the journey or not, he should have decided the change. Only he was the one authorized to influence upon the ascent. But Tom didn't take his role seriously. He was indulgent, obeyed others and it didn't worth the while. He alone, through his hesitating and fragile attitude, through his feeling of shame and guilt, excluded himself from the race. Unfortunately, the weak and temperamental ones will always pay full price.

The quality of being in the lead comes in contrast to the risk of being eliminated by a player who has a profile similar to yours who has a high-ranking and knows to play remotely by the force of suggestions and emotions. By contrast, you will not be able to complete your proposed goals through obedience or affiliation, even if you gain ground against it. But only if you double your lost value, that is, if you increase your efforts to fit within the limits of a law expressing the general will.

The question you have to ask yourself before you start to ascend: are you the projection of a response force on an axis of immunity privileges or the projection of a state of mind beyond duty?

The vision, the delegation of authority or the charisma, remain only some interesting qualities. Many a time, they can do the trick, but the attitude is the one establishing the leader's tone. The one with a hesitating attitude, the one who lets himself being pushed around and being lead by whosoever, and who has the taste for persisting in this situation, cannot call himself a leader but rather a puppet. And puppets disappear quickly from the stage of life.

Conclusion: Becoming the leader of a group requires having obligations towards that particular group. And, as understood, decisional rights inside the group. At its turn, the group is dependent on the leader. Any kind of insubordination rising from the group must be sanctioned, because, otherwise, the leader can't fulfill his mission.

The lack of determination of the leader, his hesitating attitude, the decisional incapacity and the subordination to individual interests made against those coincident with the group, will lead him to his demise from this position, so to his exclusion because of his own faults or weaknesses.

Alatura-te Comunitatii Neculai Fantanaru
The 63 Greatest Qualities of a Leader
Cele 63 de calităţi ale liderului

Why read this book? Because it is critical to optimizing your performance. Because it reveals the main coordinates after that are build the character and skills of the leaders, highlighting what it is important for them to increase their influence.

Leadership - Magic of Mastery
Atingerea maestrului

The essential characteristic of this book in comparison with others on the market in the same domain is that it describes through examples the ideal competences of a leader. I never claimed that it's easy to become a good leader, but if people will...

The Master Touch
Leadership - Magia măiestriei

For some leaders, "leading" resembles more to a chess game, a game of cleverness and perspicacity; for others it means a game of chance, a game they think they can win every time risking and betting everything on a single card.

Leadership Puzzle
Leadership Puzzle

I wrote this book that conjoins in a simple way personal development with leadership, just like a puzzle, where you have to match all the given pieces in order to recompose the general image.

Performance in Leading
Leadership - Pe înţelesul tuturor

The aim of this book is to offer you information through concrete examples and to show you how to obtain the capacity to make others see things from the same angle as you.

Leadership for Dummies
Leadership - Pe înţelesul tuturor

Without considering it a concord, the book is representing the try of an ordinary man - the author - who through simple words, facts and usual examples instills to the ordinary man courage and optimism in his own quest to be his own master and who knows... maybe even a leader.