Sight Speaks Only In The Language Of The Eyes

Only a creator of great visual sensitivity can dominate the chaos that results from a world that disappears and another that is established.

You only have to notice a blade of grass to produce an innovation of great proportions in any field, especially in medicine, physics, art, biology, chemistry. And precisely the so-called “learned” do not know how to notice a blade of grass, just as they are not aware of the basic principles or theories that unify all fields of biology: cell theory, gene theory, homeostasis and the theory of evolution. In other words, you look at the things around you in vain, if your gaze does not take into account those scientific data that explain and condition the phenomena of nature.

I do more than that. I look at the things around me with a lot of soul, they seem randomly arranged in an image made up of points, lines, shapes and various colors. And what gives the eye a moment’s respite, without exercising any choice about the color background on which the shape of each thing is established, is the freedom to compose a detailed story based on a concrete image, but one that has the depth corresponding to a rich and at the same time independent spirit.

Thus an exceptional quality of the vigorous eye is established, for example, he may prefer the drawing as a real form within the painting, or he may prefer the chiaroscuro as a simple form of detachment from the events of the world. Above all, those who know all the secrets of art know how to talk about the gift of sight as the main function of the perception of particularity contained in the absolute, without including chiaroscuro in the sphere of continuous light.

A great artist can capture, for example, the vault of a sky that almost merges with the earth, or the blue of a sky that is no longer stained with yellow. Or a sky that, although blue, looks colorless, sunless. Or, a sky glow that can put out the stars. Or a blade of grass constituted as a fragment in a boundless universe. Or a blade of grass constituted as an Alter-Ego prisoner in a parallel universe, raised to the rank of symbol through the surrealist imaginary.

Are you willing to accept the finite nature of your world when it appears to accept the authority of a higher nature that can only be mastered by the idea that “the whole is made up of isolated fragments”?

The harmonious impression given by the eyes, especially the brown ones (perhaps because they are the most beautiful eyes in the world), keeps the soul in the highest zone of subjectivity. Here, the detail must be given the right to complete a reality subject to change, based on the decorative dimension, so that the harmonious effect does not rely at all on the intensity of a fixed image, as I would have been tempted to rely, but on the quality of the composition to constitute a coherent whole capable of challenging me to discover myself while rediscovering the parallel space in which all the elements of nature are valued.

Yes. As the eternal basis of all vision, the artistic eye can prove its power to encompass the horizon line in the triple ratio of the light drawn from external reality that makes pictorial representation possible, even if it finds it difficult to capture the Supreme Beautyin “all that is mortal”. In fact, the artistic eye attaches itself to the particular even in the smallest proportions of the form that each individual thing takes, making possible the idea that the whole is made up of isolated fragments of beauty that, if we know how to collect them, delight our being.

Not only that. Art is constantly asking for new characters with a strong Ego. Walking along this line, focusing my attention on the surrounding elements, the words of a character from a novel written by Alexandre Dumas echo in my mind: “I will be strong, I will be what I want, I will dominate the chaos resulting from a world that disappears and another that is established.”

Is the purpose of your creation that of validating isolated images of nature, as a distinct form of validating the duality between the sensible and the intelligible, on the way to establishing an autonomous universe?

If the eye is the catalyst for the representation of things illuminated excessively by the solar disk, without actually tending to the representation of the surrounding space (as is the landscape in the painting) then it will not be able to highlight the significance of what can be experienced by reality. Is it not that the mind, the more it tries to memorize more elements, looking at them with the eyes of an artist, ends up focusing on shapes and colors rather than on their availability to validate the duality between the sensible and the intelligible, starting from the premise that nature is basically unpredictable?

And if the purpose of the eye is fulfilled by the supreme purpose of color within the whole landscape, light itself becoming an active subject in modifying the form of things (in accumulations of reverberations of suggestiveness), then he will depend on so many random things that it will be difficult for him to capture that intensity of life, of emotion, which spills over the whole. And just like that, thanks to the eyes that observe everything, I myself managed to look at myself as an autonomous universe, located beyond the immediate perception of the real, and to consider myself as a revealer of the totalizing vision that illuminates the soul of the world and nature.

Of course, the eye needs a vision based on sensitivity, compassion, empathy, not just imagination. For this reason, to show how great the visual sensitivity is, you have to raise the surrounding things (and various elements of nature) to the rank of symbols with a greater importance than what is apparent at first glance. Each of them must represent emotions, explore weaknesses and feelings of fragility, having the destination of representing or transmitting a secret information…

Art is an exploration of the galaxy of symbols that emanate from seemingly mundane things. And the leadership is inspired by these symbols to create some background images that support “what is missing” from a global and subjective perspective.

Sight Speaks Only In The Language Of The Eyes when the eyes are overwhelmed by the feelings that accompany sight in the process of immortalizing an image that tries through the sensible to penetrate the intelligible. And if my eyes, willing to look at such an image for a long time, will reconstruct the effects of meaning manifested in the figurative plane, maybe I will succeed in creating another reality for myself again and again, artistically transfigured, imagined by spiritual energy.