Neculai Fântânaru

Everything Depends on Who Leads

The Genesis Of The Idea Of Intellectual Film

On January 02, 2009
, in
Leadership Plus by Neculai Fantanaru
The Genesis Of The Idea Of Intellectual Film

The creative process often develops by involuntarily returning to early impressions, which can trigger significant breakthroughs in works of art.

But at the base of this artistic solution was still a memory of childhood, the period to which the genesis of the idea of the intellectual film must be traced. Unconsciously, intuitively, director Eisenstein discovered the mentioned solution by recreating an impression from his childhood in relation to Daumier's caricatures. He had then known the graphic variations around the pear that symbolized Louis-Philippe. From the portrait of the monarch, one reached, through reduction to the essential limits, up to the graph of the peerage.

Now, after more than two decades, Eisenstein discovered the unconscious connection between Philippe's pear and what he had done in "October". Because the essence of his artistic method was the following: with the means of montage, he created a sequence of images in the extremes of which were a splendid baroque deity and a primitive idol. The editing suite merged the two seemingly disparate images, joining them.

How could a visual narrative influence your perception of reality, giving you a new understanding of the relationships between different forms of expression?

The caricature was born. The cinematic image expressed, plastically, therefore, an abstract theme: the grotesque identity between the Christian cult and the primitive divinity, the emptiness that hides behind the worshiped idols. Experience, the impression from childhood was the involuntary trigger of the genesis mechanism of a unique artistic solution. Involuntary and not calculated, because Eisenstein did not realize this parentage until after the film was made.

From the "montage of attractions", a purely emotional effect, it now reaches "intellectual attraction". He also writes a manifesto in this regard, entitled "Perspectives", which does not appear, however. "October" includes all the variety of such an intellectual montage. The metaphor is presented in the most different formulas.

How would you perceive a work of art that, by reducing forms to their essentials, gives you a framework to explore the complexity and diversity of human experiences?

The intuitive process of abstraction in modern art, exemplified by Daumier's works, resonates strongly with Eisenstein's directorial methodology. By reducing the forms to the essential limits, the artist opens new paths for interpretation, similar to how Eisenstein merged disparate images in "October" - from baroque deity to primitive idol. This montage sequence of images not only simplifies the narrative, but also underscores the genesis of the idea of intellectual film, connecting seemingly unrelated historical and cultural moments into a new aesthetic synthesis that explores human and historical complexity, like Eisenstein's childhood memory of his caricatures Daumier deeply influenced the graphic variations of Louis-Philippe's portrait.

Caricature was born, a phenomenon whose depth resonated throughout the entire spectrum of the cinematic image. This expressed, through its plasticity, an abstract theme: the grotesque identity between the Christian cult divinity and the primitive ones, revealing the emptiness that was hidden behind the worshiped idols. Thus, childhood experience and memories became an involuntary catalyst of the genesis mechanism of an original artistic solution. This was not a calculated act, for Eisenstein did not realize this parentage until after the film was made, illustrating how cinematic space, as an extension of personal and collective space, continually shapes and reconfigures our perceptions and sensibilities.

Could each character you create be seen as a manifestation of an inner struggle where your soul confronts and ultimately expresses its complexities through art?

Cinematic caricature was a manifestation of the inner life of the artist, inferior to his native creative potential, full of contradictory possibilities. As in the case of every human being, where even gender identity, with all its apparent signs, only later acquires a clear definition, the cinematic image expresses this inner struggle. Through Eisenstein's caricature, this "bio-psychological drop" turns into an original artistic solution, where the Christian cult divinity is represented in a grotesque, almost idolatrous form, thus demystifying the worshiped idols.

The directorial experience, initially involuntary, served as a trigger for this deep introspection. The gradual personalization of his cinematic theme represents a unitary selection, a forced convergence of many contradictory elements, such as atavism, heredity, environment, and education, all cooperating to eliminate the original, fecund chaos. In this process, the centripetal elements are stimulated, while the centrifugal ones are inhibited.

In the end, man, and especially the artist, manages to overcome this chaos. His secret soul remembers all these internal struggles, and thus life fecundates in its chaotic plasma characters that illustrate an abstract but deeply personal theme. From this fertilization, not only the characters are born, but also the unique artistic solutions of his film.

The personalization of leadership may reflect a maturation of artistic thought, moving from confusion to clarity through the theme of a work of art.

The genesis of the intellectual film appears as a complex process that combines elements of the artist's memories, experiences and intuitions. By reinterpreting childhood memories, Eisenstein manages to create a connection between the artistic symbols of the past and his innovative methods of the present.

Drawing inspiration from Daumier's caricatures and the image of the monarch Louis-Philippe transformed into a pear, Eisenstein applies the principle of montage to juxtapose contrasting images, from the baroque deity to the primitive idol. This juxtaposition of disparate but complementary images allows him to express complex and abstract ideas, bringing to life a profound and innovative artistic vision.



* Note: Ion Barna - Eisenstein, Tineretului Publishing House, 1966.

Alatura-te Comunitatii Neculai Fantanaru
The 63 Greatest Qualities of a Leader
Cele 63 de calităţi ale liderului

Why read this book? Because it is critical to optimizing your performance. Because it reveals the main coordinates after that are build the character and skills of the leaders, highlighting what it is important for them to increase their influence.

Leadership - Magic of Mastery
Atingerea maestrului

The essential characteristic of this book in comparison with others on the market in the same domain is that it describes through examples the ideal competences of a leader. I never claimed that it's easy to become a good leader, but if people will...

The Master Touch
Leadership - Magia măiestriei

For some leaders, "leading" resembles more to a chess game, a game of cleverness and perspicacity; for others it means a game of chance, a game they think they can win every time risking and betting everything on a single card.

Leadership Puzzle
Leadership Puzzle

I wrote this book that conjoins in a simple way personal development with leadership, just like a puzzle, where you have to match all the given pieces in order to recompose the general image.

Performance in Leading
Leadership - Pe înţelesul tuturor

The aim of this book is to offer you information through concrete examples and to show you how to obtain the capacity to make others see things from the same angle as you.

Leadership for Dummies
Leadership - Pe înţelesul tuturor

Without considering it a concord, the book is representing the try of an ordinary man - the author - who through simple words, facts and usual examples instills to the ordinary man courage and optimism in his own quest to be his own master and who knows... maybe even a leader.