The Great Science Of Inquisitive Minds

Have a good control of the matter leadership is made of, setting new bridges with the main elements that stand at the foundation of implementing the Grand Science.

I had to think of something, and at the same time think of his opposite. O dark moon on top of which there was a strange and intense lit sun. So, a comparison. That was the only way to act over matter and shape it for the most various purposes. Matter was like a differential type 1 system, but with more equations, that only science could bring to their final and complete form, as acceptable as possible.

Exclusively, I was handling everything that meant gadget and information exchange, necessary for developing the experiments at the foundation of elaborating new control formulae of the Grand Science. I had the sensation that I had won my authority to control the matter that existed around me.

The formulae were some sort of checkpoints strictly directed in one way, which helped the stability of some new bridges with the main elements that stood at the foundation of implementing the Grand Science. Their use needed advanced work knowledge with much more assembly and description languages. Out of which the most used was the language of logical schematics and pseudo-codes.

Modifying them on primary directions fit perfectly in the ideal, which generated new notions and truths with the help of which I could change the principles and definitions provided in the previous information processing version. Meanwhile, the strict delimitation between two or more notions, surprising the differences between them, shaped up in a transformation code of the coordinates that determined the apparition and operation of a new thought system based on multiple relations with various knowledge fields.

The main element underlying science is the effect of a comparison that constitutes the extension of a new concept that the Ego could use to assert itself as an autonomous unity of reflection and theoretical construction.

I managed to acquire the mental pattern of the one who managed to reach several peaks. I won my madness through the amusement shown towards funny, multiple and various shapes that the deliberate amortization of thoughts in relation to information produced.

At the same time, I learned how to coagulate and ensure the solidarity of formulae that could ensure a more efficient integration of information in a cognitive pattern that could facilitate innovation. But in a shape that could be absorbed only by inquisitive minds.

Can you act on matter and shape it for more diverse purposes, taking into account the strictly individual aspect of the blockage that science creates?

Can you think of something, and at the same time of its opposite? Does modifying knowledge on primary directions fit perfectly in the ideal that generates new notions and truths?

What catches our eye in order to be able to show how leadership operates, from the perspective of man’s capacity to discover himself, is the strictly individual aspect of the barrier science creates. Especially when science, for a better achievement of the essential that defines man, can’t bring its final product to an operational, acceptable, final shape: easing the preparation and guaranteeing the deep integration of experiences and the type of thought in a certain context that would bring an advantage to leadership.

Practically, the blockage created by science is related to how you reflect on major themes in your life without considering the negative effect of using them in a unitary form of representing reality or expressing ideas and states of fact.

Choosing a leadership style that represents you and transforming it in optimal alternatives, in an efficient call-to-action, is at the same time a difficult task, but also an interesting concern. An important reference point in choosing implicitly and explicitly a style that proves what you can accomplish with help from the science you acquired over the years, is "the matter" what you have to shape for the most various purposes.

Matter is a condensed state of information, data, ideas, strategies and connection schematics with other knowledge previously acquired. Of the notions you assimilate or develop in relation to other research points that you can obtain only through experiments. But you have to know how to use them in a conventional manner, fit for creating a type of autonomy that drives you to accomplish your vocation and to see your own leadership style.

That’s why modifying knowledge on primary directions has to fit perfectly in the standard accepted by other people and necessary for understanding, able to generate new truths, new sustainable ideas, new approaches, new trends, new perspectives, new initiatives.

Can you take a giant step towards a new science, placing yourself under the influence of the force of redefining your personal identity resulting from the suggestion of a reality too complex for an authentic understanding?

The American writer Kurt Vonnegut wrote in a fiction novel a very important thing that I couldn’t forget: "Contrary to our huge brains and libraries filled with books, nobody can ask us to understand absolutely everything."

Therefore, an overload of slightly misunderstood notions will determine the apparition of a "much too full" effect, an insistent signaling of a confusion of values, of antagonist reports between the two "contracting" sides: science and leadership.

The answers to the questions raised by science can develop the insufficient training of an individual to handle matter, or, maybe, science is much too sophisticated for his understanding level. That’s why it becomes stressing to regulate in such a manner the reports between the two "contracting" sides, that the effort is justified and the effects and visible and beneficial.

If you want to have the mental pattern of the one who can climb numerous peaks, then struggle to control matter, setting new bridges with the main elements that stand at the foundation of implementing the Grand Science.

The matter you have to master is the information you can use to indicate a comparison between one thing and its opposite, in order to give life to an innovative concept.

The Grand Science Of Inquisitive Minds isn’t genetically determined, but it’s acquired in time through a permanent training of one’s neurons – the small grey cells of our brain. The training we’re subject to implies assimilating new knowledge, in small progressive dosage. And in parallel with an age-appropriate neuropsychic development, we have to expand our analysis and synthesis functions, but also the capacity to understand and generalize.

We must keep in mind that every overload caused by the great volume of knowledge and notions, assimilated in a short period of time, doesn’t usually have beneficial effects.