The Science Of Being A Science

Ask yourself what you have done for science, if you want to know how useful you have been to the progress of the world.

There are two kinds of connoisseurs.

Those who have understood the depths of the Great Knowledge, succeeding in expressing its essence in a pure metaphysical language, that is, perceived only by those initiated in the field (a very small number of individuals).

And those who have understood how to enhance the essence of the Great Knowledge through simple formulations that emanate a kind of spiritual warmth, with a strong dose of inspiration, as when continuously listening to a rhythmic, cheerful, or sensual melody, without memorizing its lyrics. Such a work touches your soul.

However, the true connoisseur is the one who combines elegant, simple, and soulful, both ways of approaching the Great Knowledge – making it not only accessible, but especially noble.

And then we have the “smart” ones, those who have understood everything, but all their lives have created absolutely nothing in the name of Science (perhaps waiting for others to do the work for them). They are the most useless for the world and its progress. The fact that you present yourself in front of the world as all-knowing, does not mean that science is moving in one direction or another.

Here, it is good to remember what Romanian aesthetician Liviu Rusu said: “They were great men in all fields, less gifted. But they managed to be huge, became “geniuses” (as might be said) through qualities of which no one speaks kindly when their absence is felt. Everyone had that strong craft consciousness, which starts by learning to execute the parts flawlessly before fussing over a large whole. They took time to do it, because the success of the details, of the accessories, gave them more pleasure than the effects of a shining whole.”

Does the pattern of your knowledge of the world follow the inter-conditioning between content and form, between ideas and the crystallized form of creation loaded with multiple and unexpected meanings?

In fact, everything that happens in this world depends on one factor: science. Scientists are the only ones moving something colossal, forever pushing Sisyphus’ huge rock. Without them, there would be no power, no progress.

While politicians seek to steal from each other a bigger bone, while ordinary people mind their own business. This is what concerns the scientists: “The dominance of the forces and spirits of nature presupposes the highest moral perfection, the highest spirituality.”

An example. Here is the opinion of the famous French physician Gérard Anaclet Vincent Encausse on what it means to assume the impact and the record of science:

“The power of man is almost nil besides that of electricity, steam or atom. But, opposing them, by certain combinations, forces as strong as they are, man concentrates them, stores them, forces them to transport or to shatter them, to reduce to a few seconds the distances they would otherwise have to travel in a few months.”

At the same time, this is the true spirituality that Prospero (Shakespeare’s character) shows when he bends the matter and the laws of the earth to his own will. Basically, he is the embodiment of the scientist, the only one capable of ascending to the status of God. He is the key that opens the gates of mystery: “As in heaven, so on earth.”

Does your experience of assimilating subtle knowledge rise to the level of knowledge assimilated through creative experience that opens the gates of mystery: “As in heaven, so on earth"?

I tend to believe that Great Knowledge belongs to angels, or to those who know how to live forever. In fact, I would say that this “Solomon’s Palace” can be experienced in the same direct way in which you experience what is tied to Creation and Creator, putting in the foreground of your achievements the experience of a miracle: to achieve something that no one else has ever achieved. And the famous words “As in heaven, so on earth” are subject to one meaning: everything has a double of itself.

By striving to rationalize your intuitive experience on the differences between idea and object, between object and form, between idea and language, between ideas and its sensitive manifestation, or between feeling and artistic image, you will be able to reach a common denominator: to consider it is useful to approach a new perspective on the nature of things in competition with their usual order.

Thus, you come to understand metaphysics. Which, in Leonardo da Vinci’s simple vision, is based on the following suggestion: “If you look at a wall studded with stains and made from a mixture of gravel, and if you have to invent a certain view, you will discover on this wall similarities with various countries, with their mountains, with rivers, rocks, trees, moors, deep valleys, hills of various aspects, you will see live battles and movements of figures and other strange occurrences of cheeks, costumes and thousands of other things which you will bring to a good and integral form.”

The great aim of leadership is to change the human being from the status of meticulous connoisseur of small things to the status of Demiurge, by exposing another perspective on the differences and similarities between things, phenomena and states.

The Science Of Being A Science positions itself according to the human experience of translating any aspect of things around it into a living language, which denotes effective communication with the universe, or with God. The depth that the chosen knowledge symbolizes, starting from each minor element of information, amplified by the resonance with which it is endowed in another plane, must be contained in the feeling of the one who uses the figurative language of the “apostles”.