93% Of The Total Of A Temporary Space

Explore your limits and horizons, contributing to the creation of particular cases of applying your own model of interpreting an unanimously accepted truth.

All this immensity that spun in front of my very eyes, unadulterated by any feeling of pressure, in a variety of subtle ways that opposed that temporary space called generality, under sign of the experimental and unconventional. It was a sort of particular visualization of a dimension supportable by the way in which it was handled, from beyond the physical, beyond the understanding of the essence of existence, from beyond the mind of its creator, viewed through the lens of an information super structural model.

In my case, wanting to delve deeper into the “Force Space of Alpha”, under the glowing power of the 5-cornered Astral of the Kabbalistic Microcosm, I had to deepen the exploratory function of thinking of a new communication interface with the philosophy set out in the Pendulum to Foucault:

“So, my greatest difficulty was to find an order in these seven measures, one that is appropriate, plentiful, different and that would keep the sense of intelligence and memory unaltered. This high and comparable arrangement fulfills not only the role of preserving what has been entrusted to me from things, words and arts, but also gives me true wisdom.”

The limits and horizons of science, well impregnated in the unaltered memory of the great creators of worlds, these artists isolated in the vastness of the universe that surrounds us, can provoke in the associative mind, faithful to the Magical Eyes of Oberon, a game of the endless analogies through the interweaving of the imaginary plane with the real one. The great splendor of science, contained within the perimeter of the convention between the symbol and the particular visualization of an enlarged image through the process of comparison, has a permanent openness to the most subtle form of the holiness of “Newton’s Chest”.

Can you register remarkable progresses on the world from the height of mysterious contemplation, in trying to study and express the need to adapt to a style of thinking transferred outside the relative loop?

If I wanted to record remarkable progress in the art of seeing the world from above, easy and unconditioned by any outside influence, if I wanted to make out the seemingly impossible formula of demanding perfection in an unreal reality – because it was new, then I had to resort to converse reasoning, from the general to the particular. It was an attempt of studying and expressing the need of adapting to a style of thinking transferred outside the loop of the relative, a style accepted as an inevitable partner in establishing truths applied in researching for a new horizon.

Unnatural, I felt caught in the mechanism of projection of an ideal of superiority that only existed in opposition with the logic of thoughts and irrational ideas, addressed in a rational way, as if I had to take action against an intelligence that went beyond the normal standard of reasonableness in giving a meaning, authentic or not. The “relative” is a permanent tension of the presupposition of changing the world, from a point of view that resurrects another world, and the loop of the relative is the return to the primordial meaning found at the crossroads between “the need to visualize the abstract” and “the need to transcend the visible”.

I was confused, subtly tied to a complicated reasoning. In a way, I found myself in the role of that character created by Pat Rushin that tried to unravel an impossible formula, unable to pass 93%, for all that he accumulated by expanding knowledge would self-destruct. It became something else, as a last act of a duel waged for several months by the two adversaries: the heavenly battle between the archangel Michael and the fire dragon. Matter is transformed by the destruction of old interpretations, reviving the compressed world in the austerity of the Alpha sign.

Are you able to create a world that is congruent with your interpretation, even if it could be a wrong world, in the attempt to receive a new perspective on the criterion of orientation towards the higher powers of the manifestation of Creation?

The practice of exploring the unknown, widely opening the gate towards the heights of science that can define man as a representative of the new world, in which thinking associated with fantasy takes a leap over what is allowed, imposes a relativity in assessing knowledge by expanding truth values from two, to three values: truth, false and probable.

What can interfere with leadership, in an attempt to receive a new perspective over the orientation criteria towards "superior powers", expanded beyond the borders of the usual and the admissible, is precisely the reasoning through which science can exist in a space without limits, a space in which imagination makes everything possible. A kind of reasoning through which you go from accepting certain generally available principles to the creation of particular cases of applying your own model of scientific interpretation, using the information you have for assessing the truth or the false in the continuous development of the relationship between world, reality, existence and perfection.

A sort of overlap between everything and nothing, in the same way a computer program is verified and validated by reality before being implemented on a large scale in different institutions. Only with one amendment: that of not confusing the mind with a logic that has a myriad of opposites, pushing you towards excessive ambiguity, difficult to decipher.

The superior power of the manifestation of Creation is found in the interpretation you give to an ideal, pure, geometrical world, even if this interpretation may be wrong or misunderstood.

Daniel Castro, the American layer specializing in economic disputes was very right: "When we make a judgement it means that we will create the mental model of an expected universe. In fact, we create a world congruent with our interpretation, even if it could be a wrong world." In other words, the tendency of redefining previous ideas and ideals can be a passing from a smaller world into an immeasurable universe that is fulfilled by the thick and complex chain of assimilated consciences.

To create a world congruent with your interpretation, even if it could be a wrong world, means to distance yourself from concrete reality, but also from the only possibility of acceding to a superior standard of thinking. The exclusively personal interpretation, basing yourself solely on it, can lead to a utopian world, without any connection to the concrete of today, but that defines and encourages the possible of tomorrow.

The exploration function of creation has as its primary source of inspiration its own model of interpreting the unanimous truth accepted by the rest of the world, specifying that the same truth can at any time take another turn towards the concrete of the perceivable reality only by the minds that know to transcend the visible.

93% Of The Total Of A Temporary Space signifies the conducting of transitioning to an advanced stage of evolution – close to the absolute, by creating particular cases of applying your own model of interpreting the reality you know, or rather what is called "unanimously accepted truth".

Leadership is possible by reinterpreting this complex world, basing itself on the phrase: "power is renewed through intellectual orientation and analytical skill that facilitates the development of all possible options of the future."

The mental model based on self-reasoning, must be consistent with a present horizon (narrowed, fearful, with thousands of questions with variable answers). But at the same time, it must resonate with an essentially mobile horizon, one that includes the depths (in interpretation) from beyond the scope of vision.