A New Thinking Of Leadership
Start to have regard for the direction of your development, achieving a rapprochement between what you imagine that you are and what you are able to admit that you really are.
I do not understand what I could’ve seen in others, more than I could’ve seen in myself, in the case of incandescent imagination, for which reason a secret is germinates, and a discovery is required in-depth. I contrived everything from a desire of something different, such as the eerie closeness to a star shining ceaselessly through modifications of universal matter, through that "nothing is lost, everything is transformed", somehow through itself an illustration of the depth of my spirit of incorporating everything together.
Although inaccessible, I was still a man with broad views, a versatile construction of the type "intelligent driver", under the effect of invisible matter of a system of operation that could be run from anywhere called the Universe. Thoroughness was right for me. The tiniest discovery, accompanied by the feeling of an affective resonance, beyond that permanent state of exhaustion specific to the seekers of untold truths, awakened within me the chance of a new victory at an angle from which I viewed modern science.
Evolution is a consequence of truths not said in time, an unmistakable proof of the meticulousness with which new points of view are drawn on what scientific research can give in a context of the type: “believe in a Creator seen as an entity of your own being.”
Being a messenger of a revealing destiny of new meanings and experiences means to think of yourself as a winner in a race with yourself, but in which you can test your limits to the level at which you are prepared to assume a painful choice.
Basically, everything I imagined about the world as an own creation in which no one can penetrate because of the acceptance of what was in my power to change through my evolution was to create a context of free access to a wealth of information that could not have been picked elsewhere and could even guide a scholar in a labyrinth of revelations and profound anticipative visions.
My only concern was about choosing between right and wrong, between good and bad, creating difficulties for others’ freedom of expressing their points of view vis-à-vis the relationship with a Creator who allows himself to juggle with thoughts, with moral crashes, with any subtlety of the being, without being affected in any way by the consequences of a nefarious mystification.
The hardest pain of a Creator is to feel no trace of guilt to the accomplished fact, like a writer who shares his thoughts on paper without directly touching the rationality of his readership.
Can you put in a favorable light what you experience at a level of an a priori knowledge without affecting compatibility with the precision of measuring the parameter "I am a Universe"?
A physics professor at Princeton by the name of Robert Dicke proposed, at one point, a different theory of general relativity, modifying Einstein’s ideas. Keeping the idea of curved space, he added the idea of a field of forces, which led to the modification of fundamental, unanimously accepted equations, allowing for the explanation of other phenomena such as the redshift of spectral lines.
Everything you think in the field of science has the privilege of being challenged, or on the contrary, it can create a context of free access to new existential horizons. What can be considered as a reaction to important events in human life, in the light of findings which confirm the urgency of an appreciable increase of the construction of the décor of transformational effects of knowledge, has its origin in a phenomenology of the depth taken from the perspective of a freedom of borderless self-determination.
An a priori knowledge is the expression of the responsibility of rendering a truth that is intangible, in the background of a world that wants us, as an imperative of the passing time.
The strong stimulating character of the art of transposing yourself in a universe, as far as getting to the core of certain reflections and teachings intended to confirm the axiom that man himself is a small fragment from an interminable code can emphasize your endowment with the power of achieving convergence between what you imagine you are – "a totality" and what you are capable of admitting that you truly are – "a segment of totality".
Induced at a mental level, the feeling of this convergence between "totality" and "a segment of totality", exploring everything that is new and replacing the old that no longer satisfies you rationally or existentially becomes, from this perspective, a land of contrasts, highlighting the oscillating attitude between two competing identities.
First, an identity that discovers itself as sources of inspiration characteristic to a different, much more advanced version of thinking are assimilated. Then, an identity that makes you a prisoner of petty, limiting perspectives.
A creator who thinks in terms of choosing “I am a universe” can be counted as the image of a fascinating space of thought in which truth does not matter much, but only the story he says about his Ego – who must make people exclaim “Wow”.
A New Thinking Of Leadership is given by the unity between ideas assimilated by relating to what is unknown and the image you project in the world, depending on the affective resonance and the fruitful appreciation you feel towards the direction of your development determined by the relationship between the two entities: the realist convinced of his truths and the storyteller asphyxiated in real terms by the product of his fiction.
