The Limit Of A Researcher In The Complex Space Of Science

Provide a continuous development for leadership, creating new foundations of the science that is consistent with your personality.

I found myself in a mysterious correspondence with the foundations of complicated metaphysics, but beautiful through its rigor, after the specificity of trying to exercise my right to lead a universal empire. Tireless, I tried understanding the physical and psychological effects of the thoughts that intensely cross the obligation to be the Choice of a more "pragmatic" faculty, using indicators of measuring my progress in the transition between two states: disorientation and awakening.

These were necessary for subordinate objectives, such as the finding of a higher intensity of the dynamics of creation, that I could’ve been able to determine only through a collation of different interpretations, but which were subject to severe contradictions. Practically, the science I was practicing, the acceptance of a new vision of interpreting and edifying an art without obstacles, the abundance of details and emotions marked by the prolongation of life, was the representation of a reality filtered through a distinct sensibility different from what I was accustomed to seeing.

With subtlety, with the bold daring of a researcher that wouldn’t allow themselves deceived by appearances, I approached that intense light of the "Yes", impossibly to modify, which could very well have meant "No". The result of these two opposite forces was a force which, acting as a black hole that inexorably absorbs matter, acts upon the turning point towards a new understanding of science. Was this the beginning of an experience of making knowledge whole?

Can you understand your life experiences without taking an attitude of rejecting the belief that everything that is rendered as an exercise of creation results in a profound sense of power?

Like a physicist that, by taking two lead spheres, tries to measure the force of attraction between them, I have tried to put together the pieces of a jigsaw jumble, so as to determine the most powerful, permanent and indissoluble connection between man and his own self. In this way, I’ve taken, as a user, control of the most efficient "equipment" that participates to the construction of the inner universe of man, to his way of being.

This high efficiency equipment, translated by its unlimited understanding, the singular guarantee of a complete and uniform penetration into the root of human nature, if it were to be used properly it could’ve distillate mentalities to infinitesimal odds, to transparency, all the way to the essence. The powerful instrument also had the role of facilitating assimilation – it took over and transported in safety conditions towards a complex system of analysis, any type of armament or ammunition, any flammable emotion, any restlessness. Any waggish thought crossing the mind and accepted as an idea. Any vibration. Any manifestation that, going beyond measure, placed man in a tense context.

But I was wrong in many respects. I could not assure the permanence of this machine, I could not precisely measure the actionable and predictable parameters of man’s character. For I was turned upside down by the foundation upon which the entire philosophy of young researcher Rulie Karl Frantevici rested on: "Facts without explanation cannot be considered science. But neither can the theory that isn’t built on the study of facts be based on experience and it is rather purely speculative – it too, is not science."

Since then I have not been the same. The researched turned out to be, in turn, human. The sense of power that alchemy gave me through the intense training of the mind, through the act of creation, was suddenly canceled by that norm of life that says: “you will always have doubts about what you see and the way you perceive what you see.”

Can you establish the unknowns in the equations of reality in which your creative power is self-sufficient in relation to a world of concepts well established within you by reference to the temporal succession of the phenomena involved in the transformation of the human being?

At the boundary between the imaginary and the real that constitutes the ideas and beliefs supported by strong combinatorial arguments of TRUE and FALSE, ensuring the development of research underpinning the development of theories, is the creative dimension that articulates a new vision of man, as a result of science. And this vision must always be conditioned by the practical dimension.

Hence the need for as relevant of an evaluation as possible, making considerable adjustments to the estimates and assumptions considered in the test of appreciation or depreciation of the quality of the human subject. Two unknowns fed my fear of failure in the work of creation: the proof of the practice of a philosophy that transforms, enriches and eases man’s life, and proves a lucid thinking and an exceptional intuition that translates into something of high frequency with reference to the Kingdom Of The Divine Logos.

The role of scientific research, in the intention of following the way in which thinking reflects to the level of behavior and in the intention of highlighting common patterns from the psychological structure of man is neither to falsify the truth, nor to disappoint through lack of cohesion of ideas acquired and enunciated. But it behooves it to offer an Ariadne’s thread, leading, through a maze of various interpretations, to at least one exit. Towards a fixed abutment. Towards determining a model of concepts that can provide adequate resistance to the elaborated points of view, suitable to their share in leadership.

The reality of the specificity of my creation is a profound reflection on the tendencies of metamorphosis in the “New Man” of interpreting the information accumulated in a field that doesn’t mean only present, but also, and most importantly, future.

The phenomena involved in the transformation of the human being are related to the development of a mentality focused on the accumulation of modes of expression in a wider framework of creation, configured not only by the freedom of thought, but also by the attestation of the value of life and the price paid so that life can be experienced and be meaningful. An example of the phenomenon would be “remind yourself of your goals but it’s your big dream that can really help you work hard”.

By developing new conceptions of "Man", embracing with enthusiasm or, more precisely, with a constructive curiosity any unknowns from the equations of reality in which he places himself in, trying to interpret them by relating to what is characteristic of him, you will be able to follow the way in which he develops and consolidates his own thinking.

And this process of research, supported by powerful combinatorial arguments of TRUE or False that prove the validity and poignancy of the findings, is reflected in the relationship between leadership and psychological lucidity.

Can you turn yourself into an object of scientific research with the purpose of acquiring abilities of producing a reality capable of smoothening the way towards revealing an eternal truth?

But turning man into an object of scientific research, systematically placing him in the position of a "toy" for those experiments aimed at measuring knowledge and your most accentuated skills, may guarantee a complete penetration into the space of leadership. That breakthrough guided by a mature understanding of the psychological and motivational resorts that may result in your own evolution.

An object of scientific research is intended to represent a reality filtered through the penetrating analysis of a private detective who must find a unique connection between human personality traits and longevity, a connection between an ordered fact and a random fact that can produce a strong reflection on the meaning of someone’s existence.

For as hardwoods coming only from certain trees, so too does the essence that individualizes you, the singular variant of your own Ego, cannot be redefined or replaced, it can only manifest itself according to its own configuration. Indeed, you can improve your skills by accessing others’ way of thinking, relating to a higher level of consciousness. But you will not be able to mimic or quantify talent by certain canons.

Before being superior to others by better understanding science, be aware of your own limitations. Conduct research on yourself. Try to put together the pieces of that puzzle that defines you. Consider new foundations of sorting your own qualities by reassessing your relationship with experience accumulated throughout time. If you want to ensure a continuous development of leadership, try to create new foundations of science that are consistent with your personality.

After all that I have learned from life, through all that I have written over the years, I can draw a single conclusion in the form of a profound truth: “Who is not able to orient his conscience towards a superior, highly advanced world, will deepen into a total darkness from which he will never escape.”

Leadership is the cognitive value of a creation, aesthetically, scientifically, or technically, which embraces an artist’s personality in using the means by which an inner truth can obtain a communicable form.

The Limit Of A Researcher In The Complex Space Of Science draws attention to the negative consequences of your curiosity towards everything around you, especially to the laws in a continuous state of change that govern man. Also, prioritize that space of research of the human specific, wider or narrower, that influences leadership the utmost.