Becoming Yourself In The World Of Science

Try to make your scientific authority a materialization of the spirit of looking with confidence towards the future, identifying the changes that occur in the context of acquiring a higher self-awareness.

I have always thought of myself as a scientist who seeks the principles and root causes of a unique physical reality, bound to use my superior qualities as a good observer to acquire a new power of calling and enlightenment, as a demonstration of intellectual faith that had to be proved before being credited without reservation.

Science was the only preventive means against passions and ardors that could be condemnable and destructive if they managed to direct my eyes and senses to a point of little interest to mean something for the progress of the world.

Thus, the consequences of such an intention were spiritual, for I always felt that I was approaching the desire of the universe conjoined with the increase of the abundance of creative potency (information, images, interpretations, fascinating realities, reflections) when I started to make a new way of thinking and presenting ideas. I felt as though I was in front of a work of fiction, in an atmosphere of interiority defended by the force that assures the cosmic order along with all that life implies on earth.

The only logical explanation of the abundance of meanings and significations that assaulted my interior, thus claiming my well-deserved place in what I write, seeking to maintain myself anchored in the visible of a physical (visible) and metaphysical (unseen) world, was that my destiny was fed by the coincidences of previous steps in configuring the frontiers of knowledge that the ancient alchemists had gone through.

The magical wand that turns any idea into a genuine diamond was associated with time and energy consumed in fertile reflections and views.

Or, rather, I think I was trying to use myself as a reminder of a past life, where I lived through someone else’s belief in a world where science and technology had to open unimaginable horizons. Under this word “faith” is now hiding my whole initiative to determine the fundamental changes that take place in the destiny of the world, whose stake is the attainment of a superior stage of development and spirituality.

Leadership: Can you assume your attachment to the totality of the being that is ascending to greatness, referring to an act of will designated by the phrase “a materialization of the spirit of being One in the multiple”?

Italian physicist Alessandro Volta sent a letter to the German physicist Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, from which we can extract the following passage:

“No matter how much you recommend this letter to young physicists, it will not be too much. It will initiate them in the difficult art of experiences; teach them not to trust the first observations, to always change the shape of the apparatus. And if the impatient imagination would make them leave the slow but sure path of observation for seductive dreams, they may be stopped on this slippery ground, seeing as a man of genius takes note of everything.”

Reading these lines, I realized that what is very important for my soul, which always has the right to be witness to the struggles and aspirations of every moment, is to deepen the mentality of the experimenter and the discoverer who knows where to look and what to find in order to be able to express a firm view of the results desired to be materialized.

The totality of the being that raises you to greatness resides in the duty of the scientific spirit to always and everywhere be the center of those changes designed to stimulate interest in knowledge and self-knowledge. And a materialization of the spirit of “being One in the multiple” suggests the merging of several mentalities and characters into a single superior intelligence entity whose only visionary reality is exerted through a broadening of spiritual consciousness.

A higher self-awareness is achieved by optimizing the relationship between the penetrating intuition of seeing beyond the immediate face of things and widening the horizon of knowledge that materializes through experience and discovery.

An unexpected success or an unsuccessful attempt are two of the turning circles of the philosophy of science, each of them representing an expression of the belief of looking into the future. After all, my life experience must not only be an exceptional conquest of science but must be considered a reflection, a mirror of the soul that tries to always translate into words and deeds in order to do things that can withstand the time and memory of the world.

The opportune moment of acquiring a new self-consciousness matters more than the opportunity for me to develop as a quality man, a specialist in a field, in order to acquire a leading position in the world. A scholar achieves true value only through the expression of the faith he traverses and shares through what he brings to the service of progress.

Leadership: Are you trying to give life to something that can undo itself by looking at it as an initiatory experience, subsumed exclusively to the logic of self-seeking in a higher-level creation approach?

Thorough preparation in a particular branch of science may fall into a rigid syndrome of dependency to the hidden depth of creation that willingly mixes the miraculous registry with that of the supernatural. But what if the findings and assessments on new opportunities of assimilation and connection of innovative ideas produced over time, opposes the formal blueprints applied by the others, are subjected to certain inner distortions, conscious or unconscious?

The inner blaze, as a fire unlit, the passion for study can be quenched or can even disappear if you develop a high degree of dependency to a higher level authority, to a thinking much too thorough. Such an authority can be a model of a discoverer of a hypothetical world or of a new science.

Evidence in this case is the famous alchemist, Fulcanelli, whose findings and observations are up to this day of great interest in the scientific world. He often wanted to state: "The books of the masters are not written for everyone, although all are urged to read them." No wonder he fiercely kept his secrets of science, of either mystical or symbolic nature. But what somehow highlights his feeling of superiority is that, like all alchemists, Fulcanelli expressed himself in a manner less tangible to the larger public. And he himself asserted that his last manuscript will never be published because nobody would understand its contents.

Through this, the expression: "to give life to something that can cancel itself" can be translated. Science much too advanced draws you new horizons, but at the same time cancels the guarantee that you can be understood, restricting your desire of giving answers and guidance. Let us thank our mind, full of aspirations, carried by imagination and ideas towards areas inaccessible by knowledge, because it wards us about the fact that it cannot fully grasp those aspects that have immediate impact in the way of relating to everyone around.

The mind, tantamount to promoting the creation of our own identity, must point out exactly what our borders and limitations are. And then, with our right foot forward, may we step together with it in the search for the Wizard of Oz, but with the condition of not venturing too far into the unknown, like Gulliver in the land of the Lilliputians. He who allows himself trapped in the workings and connections of the superiority of thought, with thousands of tiny threads connected to the farthest of perspectives, with great effort will awaken from the sleep of his obscure reason.

Self-seeking in a top-level creation approach is a way to get more information about what defines you under the influence of a concentrated and constant power called “imagination” represented by the perpetuation of a “revolutionary language”.

Becoming Yourself In The World Of Science is the consideration that you have to take into account when you try to recognize your degree of adaptability and malleability to a consciousness that has the distinctive sign that it remains anchored in both the eternal values of faith and the requirements of efficient use of knowledge in the light of discoveries.