Matter Submits To Its Creator

You need a clear vision to focus on what you are creating, but at the same time you need to have a huge mass of matter on your side that can stay in a “stable” state for as long as possible.

I was reading a book about Alfred Nobel, considered at one time to be one of the most horrible criminals in the history of the world. His huge fortune was amassed from the manufacture of an infernal product, dynamite, which caused a sense of secret horror to anyone approaching his home. Millions of people were killed with his dynamite. But he forgets that dynamite was created not for war, but for other purposes: mining, harboring, tunneling, and other work that makes work and life easier for people.

But something else arouses in me a solidarity with his reign, a kind of interweaving of the power of comprehension of the mind with the resizing of a reality which can neither be experienced nor named immediately. Well, Alfred Nobel, subject to some confidentiality and other safeguards, had hundreds of substances in his personal laboratory in San Remo, Italy. One more flammable than the other, like a kind of magical object passed through fire and unexpectedly transformed into a heliocentric model of the universe. And, of course, the explosives – including “Nitroglycerin” – were stored in varying amounts in containers that were quite unsafe at the time.

A single drop, if it had been spilled on the table or on the floor, would have exploded – and the blast would have spread over a radius of hundreds of square meters. But despite all the danger, the scientist has been sidelined for the rest of his life by any kind of accident. Be surrounded by death, and let death be far from you. To be protected from life in any death trap. And if I were a Creator myself, and if such a creator were to measure all worldly things by a much longer than average human life, I would choose to embark on a marathon that defies death.

Indeed, I must ask myself this question: what sort of thinking can lead to a result that pleases everyone, but also represents me and fulfills me the most?

Is your relationship with the content of your creation appropriate to a higher thinking obtained through a deepening of knowledge in a deterministic system that facilitates the trajectory of a “double bond”?

Matter obeys its creator; this is the first law of science. And not everyone achieves this performance, but only those who have embarked on a long journey and long searches. Matter listens to the one who knows how to handle it best, taking into account the extent to which the creator manages, using the essential help of the phenomenological view, to understand this attempt at thinking within the philosophy of nature. Beings are made up of a part of organic matter, and life results from the advancement of matter.

This leads us to the conclusion that he who believes in a Creator of the universe also believes in a ubiquitous, protective, tolerable, resilient energy. And the one who moves things in the direction of personal will is the one who knows how to transform matter in order to obtain a fulminating result in two worlds: spiritual and material.

Of course, this is where the spiritual level of power comes into play. “The battle is in heaven”, between the world of matter and that of antimatter, or having a direct correspondence between the vibrations of matter and pure consciousness. Not between bodies, not between physical properties. Try, for example, to penetrate with the Creator’s eyes everything around you, to animate and guide the matter within the things, ensuring the passage of a “double connection” trajectory: between man and God, between theory and research, between soul and the nature.

Try to encourage things to work the way you want them to. Try to animate everything by attributing a certain affinity to it, investing it with that quality of being “at peace with yourself” in terms of a certain homogenization of a spiritual nature, or in terms of a dialectic that must lead to a universality. Can you?

Can your personality double in the face of an image transfer from creator to receiver, by adapting your essence to the content of an existence that manifests its greatness in a subjective reality?

It is admissible that a creator interposes himself between chance and discovery, between vision and concrete efforts, being able to change the relentless outcome that emerges in those who have failed to connect to the Intelligence of Universal Matter. In other words, the success of a creator is not just an image of a discovery, but expresses a reality on a microscopic scale, where matter is only the mysterious expression of a sovereign will.

Do you remember Prospero from Shakespeare’s opera, who had been the Duke of Milan? By means of spells and other forms of magic, he could order matter, he could rob anyone of the power to oppose him. With the strongest spirits subject to his will, he could start the winds and waves of the sea at will. At his command a terrible storm arose, in the midst of which the very ship of his enemies was terribly shaken, but yet he had arranged the matter in such a way that no one on the ship was harmed. His bold plans could turn into a death-defying commitment at any time. Therefore, Prospero penetrated everything, enlivened and guided everything within matter, forming within the whole matter any individual existence.

Prospero is not a simple story character, he represents the non-material essence of a perfect creator.

In telling you this, I would like to acknowledge a certain achievement: I know how to construct an image in which the force of things, as it is ordered and incomprehensible, is combined with the eternal motion of matter throughout the confrontation with myself, manifesting itself as a representation of a high will in faith.

An important part of leadership is the relative form of creation that you experience in the “hidden” world that depicts reality by capturing the non-material essence of a perfect creator.

Matter Submits To Its Creator, and we can in no way decide its extent except by taking as a starting point the subjective reflection on thought previously conceived as subjectivity.