Science Builds Art

Find new means of artistic expression, thinking up the work within the material you have.

I had a great need for a remedy for a separation between the concrete and the abstract, in the course of the interaction between revolutionary innovation and the expansion of an entity of thought-form to a "border" entity where the calls for new benchmarks of creation stopped. My talent couldn’t become obvious through the joining of the two, even if they would bring new update perspectives in support of the permanence of my authority in the field of epistemology.

A first limitation of mine could be determined by the vivid colors and deep shadows, all linked randomly in a less close unity, which I tried implementing in a painting, without defining their features by association with certain states or situations. It was as if I had to train my imagination to recreate the life of objects that could no longer find their place in a universe without name, or simply forgotten in time because the painting seemed to capture only the details of a reality full of contrasts.

I didn’t have to be a great drawer to show certain ideas, small glimpses of coherence, but for this I had to search for the right color for my conceptions, same as a sculptor thinks up his work within the material he has. I’d more often lose myself in the indistinct outline of random scribbles, born of imagination, but with claims of great art.

Can the assessment of your creation be understood as a “validation” of the fairness of interpreting a content of thought that can be reduced to seeking realism or aesthetics governed by the reproduction of the details of a questionable reality?

In fact, my talent wasn’t a special form of expression through the means of additions of processing scientific elements, wasn’t linked neither to the correct placing of the various elements of artistic composition, but it was rather closely related with the vast applicability of the laws of observation that fueled new theories and concepts.

The content of thinking that favored me in making creations, as with an engineer who combines different data and material elements for building, lifting and supporting a bridge over a river, was not justified in explaining new phenomena, or in order to understand the explanations proposed by others, but to pursue different ideas in a harmonic whole. The interpretation of this content depended on the perception of certain events and literary characters that facilitated direct contact with original works of art.

French scholar Rene Descartes, of which is told has founded analytic geometry, tried to present a system of the world in which the entire universe, from the Sun and stars to human physiology – was a huge mechanism governed by mechanical laws. The result of his concerns was that he set the basis of new perspectives of dealing with the process of change, from which resulted new and serious challenges for me, from which I had much to gain.

Inspiration, often difficult to achieve, is a form of introducing yourself in the space of someone else above yourself, performing a number of qualitative observations with the help of which you try to answer personal questions.

But no matter how carefully you’d look at things in the whole of common concerns, you could still register differences of views. And a presence that is completed with another presence knows that these differences represent only a few of the characteristics with added value of the way of approaching science and art.

Can you ensure the handling of your own "Replies" in an attempt to deal with science through the means of cultivating the visibility of art?

It is easier to talk about change than to do it, which constitutes only one sort of feeble intention of fighting against a thought-form entity that wants to be revealed for an outside understanding – overall – of personal development.

Only when the thoughts start to get a certain form through the process of creation, depending on an influence that pushes you to leap more into knowledge, the switch from on approach to another can be made, especially in the case of a so-called relationship between "observation" and "experiment."

From a momentary scribble, new forms of expression can be formed, new forms of artistic expression. The "distinguishable" and "indistinguishable" that act upon the cumulation of experience in noticing aspects of detail, or of maximum generality, forming a more or less successful painting, are exclusively dependent on an operator called "complexity" that has its echo in the elements of objective perception.

The visibility of art can be achieved by combining ideas into imagination with all those aspects of the reality provided by the senses (a priori), along the line drawn by the path to recognizing a new intrinsic dimension of the human being.

Do you feel that a particular thing finds correspondence with your inner-motif, with your emotional flow, with the vision of a beginning? Leadership has as a development support an approach that explores the role of the individual in identifying those niches of interpreting visions, emotions and forming relationships between the conclusive landmarks of creation, which can generate understanding abilities of a high level.

Art, of which can be affirmed that it has the function of representing new compositions of image, becomes visible when others manage to connect to this image. It can indicate a concrete of the significance of your creation.

The ensemble of "Replies" shows the parallelism between the information obtained with the help of a representation of forms and information you can take up as being general truths. The latter can contribute both to the development of science and to the establishment of the foundation of a new system of thinking.

You can ensure the handling of your own "replies" in an attempt of dealing with science only if you manage to represent the reference elements of an image (the conclusive landmarks of your creation) in the space of a special knowledge, in the configuration of an emotional experience, or in the space of a new identity.

Leadership is the creative guiding point of representing a suggestive, powerful image that can be improved when looking for and combining the means to achieve a practical goal.

Science Builds Art when man thinks up his work within the material he has, or when he starts seeking and processing the material fitting to his conceptions following random scribbles. Science is closely connected with the applicability of the laws of observation that fuel new theories and concepts.

Artistic expression is a process of invention and production of the new that gives the shape of the adventure called knowledge. Often times it represents a realization of the scribbles…