The Madness Of Knowledge In The Space Of Extended Reality

Focus on reaching a certain stage of the process of refining and processing knowledge, strengthening your ability of suggesting authentic formulas for existence.

I didn’t know all the relationships between existence and nonexistence. It seemed to me that nothingness was only an irreversible effect of extending an illusion, like that of space-time. And that it is made up of true unwritten laws. I could remain framed in the geometry of a world explored strictly scientifically, through the force of interpreting various types of concepts, situations, processes, and of the way in which I maximized the relationships between entities unobservable directly, conceived in the coordinates of a fantastic universe.

An act of consciousness beyond space and time. I was making an experiment that depended on reaching a certain stage of the process of processing the knowledge based on subjective beliefs, integrating certain entities of meaning in the space of my existence, through reduced analysis – beautiful-ugly, good-bad, love-hate. But especially by the combined use of the beliefs unaligned to the wave fields of the truths of the world. Nonconformist, I caught the phenomena that appeared daily before my eyes, succeeding and repeating itself without pause, as the rotation of moons around planets.

When an artist wants to experience that freedom of any unprofitable state, he takes as an inspirational character a person identified with the history of a world that preserves its identity and meaning in a wondrous space, wonderful illusions of new questions from other lives and other universes.

The great insanity of knowledge is to identify yourself with a character who has a world of his own, one you try to understand and create or recreate in a space of self-communication through the word of an almighty creator.

In the examples used for the manifestation of creation there is always a deviation from the spatial framework marked by the vertical and horizontal of a world dominated by two complementary powers: symbolism and universalism. If at first these truths I reached were proven to be pure speculation, simple curiosities that were utterly useless, a back-and-forth of lights and shadows, they later transformed into certainties that opened the gate of answers to the guiding question of German philosopher Martin Heidegger: "What is existence?"

In Cervantes’ novel, the realistic and practical man, Sancho Panza, tries to cure Don Quixote of his madness. The idea was to put a mirror in front of his madness, to record each of his absurd and ridiculous illusions, so he can plainly see inside his own inner world and not allow any external factor to obscure the truth.

But Don Quixote’s mind refuses to see with clarity the "obvious" and understand the transforming valence of his personality. However, he manages to perceive things more clearly than anyone around him, because he disregarded the mental clichés that clouded the judgment of others.

Do you broaden the horizons of science by satisfying the aspiration of the extensive exploitation of discoveries that direct the existence into a framework of creation that pauses where the world usually ends it?

Science is what remains after you have justified your invasion of private life by the forces of a vision that borders on madness. Supporting a vision is a process that can be based on defining unknown truths, showing the world from a promising perspective. But, at the same time, it is a way of strengthening your capacity of suggesting authentic formulas to existence, which in turn creates all other forces.

My whole artistic approach aims at the activity of a creation that pauses where the world usually ends it, with a sense of poetry, combining fiction and reality in a story that goes beyond the immediate spectacle of life and projects a touching light over the most derisory of deeds. Vision gives an insight into the degree of incorporating science into a unique framework, in which leadership can manifest itself as a mental force of penetration and perception of a collection of truths that can change the way in which people see existence, the world and their place in it.

In fact, my madness was that I was living two completely separate lives: one in which science changed the way I was thinking about the world and one of a story in which I was the main character of a series of unwanted interactions of a reality with unpredictable effects. The discoveries can serve as a shining example of the power of doing science, even if the notions with which you operate, depending on the subjective interpretations attributed to reality, are as such constituted so as to offer existence a simplified fundamental meaning, unmarked by the positive or negative assessment of those around.

Here I refer to a type of leadership that can be fulfilled only if you progress on the path of the "Artificial Existence Form" experiment, aiming at building a reality that can be capitalized into a multitude of fictions in relation to several points of view. A creation that pauses where the world usually ends it is a whole of many elements such as imagination, composition, language, interpretation, chromatics, stylistic, perspective, message, which only a story succeeds in reproducing it best outside the life recognized as such through practice.

Is your leadership built on the science of questions that find their answers in the “sparkle of madness”, as opposed to drawing new coordinates of humanist bills at the center of a fiction that must be taken as a reality?

The sparkle of madness, which has become a kind of attempt to render a strong emotion that reveals itself only in the practice of better positioning of thought in a direction of creation, can be perceived as a struggle between two distinct personalities: one who wants to change the world, another who wants to be part of a world that does not follow the rules of reality. It is like you are part of a story whose character is rising from mystery with an extraordinary force to immortalize a full, true existence.

This type of leadership, built on the science of questions that find their answers in the "spark of madness", is a form of self-employment in the act of defining and promoting a new reality constituted from true unwritten laws. That is, forged by integrating certain entities of meaning in the space of existence.

We resist the habit of mixing false conclusions with correct ones. We will say that leadership is based on producing revelations experienced and expressed by the individual who possesses a mind absorbing of new meanings and premises, subjected to a logical reasoning (meaning a correct one), resulting in something that contradicts the reality that others see. The leader is the individual who succeeds in perceiving things more clearly than anyone else around him, because he disregards the mental clichés that cloud the judgment of others.

He who tries to establish a new reality, a new tab of existence which can have more meaning, used as a substitute for an improvement of the act of scientific knowledge, by exploiting and recovering the unknown and the non-explicit, will be able to pave the way towards promoting a new definition of leadership.

A fiction that must be taken as a reality is an existence whose solemnity can be sustained, interestingly, depending on the act of creation to which you owe it to give it a note of “madness” through the very vision communicated through a self-portrait made from the perspective of an omniscient narrator.

The Madness Of Knowledge In The Space Of Extended Reality aims at that experience of creating a new reasoning that leads to the articulation of new points of view on existence that can condition the balance of the individual with the world. Man can master reality, world and existence only as he gets to know them scientifically. And only by the combined use of beliefs unaligned to the "wave fields" of universally accepted truths.