The Phenomenology Of Science

Access the power of science to enter into the subtle game of confusion, amplifying that characteristic of thinking that arises from the contact between experience and the thread of life.

Everything seemed detached from a set of views beyond appearances, beyond reason, beyond things, beyond the infinite. In agreement with the unique area of pseudo-truths, under the sphere of improvisation and unpredictability. Isolated, I was in a vast process of evolution, stretching as a sort of directing attention in another direction, expressed through an entity of meaning that fed itself with the answers to the endless questions.

Nonconformist. I was cast in a role that was not credible for a normal man, in a world dominated by a science that varied on so many unknowns arranged as combinations of continuous and interrupted lines within generalized coordinates. The task of coordinating indexes and perception sensors involved in developing a new cognitive structure became more complex and critical as the questions and answers were gathered.

Implausible. I am at the point of utmost altitude, driven by that unending thirst of catching between the vertebrae of the mind the ineffable that only the genius can release, which burns you to the depth of your soul, making you involuntarily enter into a subtle game of confusion, yet still attracting curiosity. The indefinite that I could not fit in a form, and that God Himself with His omnipotence had branded with the red iron of the measure of the esoteric transcendental, became a product of impulses that generated spontaneous outputs.

A perspective indicator. I did not limit myself to general observations, but I began to attribute metaphysical meanings to attractive searches, fluid feelings. At the risk of exaggerating the edges of science, damaging the truths obtained through revelation. Like leaping into understanding the universe, moving from an obscure space to a clear space.

I think I resembled French botanist Lamarck: "He was reading one book after another, filled whole reams of paper, scribbling book pages with a lot of notations. An amalgam was born in the mind: the judgments of the medieval alchemists were intertwined with the ancient Greek theories, and the contradictory hypotheses collided in his brain in a kind of mad dance."

Are you guided by the temptation to place science anywhere in the space of subjectivism, building integration patterns of a new orientations coordinates at the existential level?

The essence of the first metamorphosis of science is a kind of incompatibility intimate with madness, in the process of continuous and unmistakable reflection on personal reality. The way you train your own thinking, which is a class of considerations and reflections that can only be found in the subtle game of confusion that triggers a new wave of questions and answers, under the sphere of improvisation and unpredictability, enters you into a sort of mad race towards achieving a different degree of development.

More specifically it is that progress of science able to make you master the solid foundation of a deep and revealing experience, the unique effects of a new reality. The true art of mastering science is highlighted in what is not obvious, what is not visible at first glance, in the reality masked by assumptions and exceptions. Leadership attains in this new context an adage of unlimited power, because it allows you to discover what attracts you as information and significance, not only as an orientation of perspective on a medium and long term.

A Russian scientist said at one point: "Unlike art, where the most important thing is vivid and immediate reaction to what we see and hear, in science you need to learn to amaze yourself of the results of thought, of the meaning of knowledge gained. The noblest of motivations and the one that best suits the spirit of science is curiosity, the desire to learn how nature is made."

Information extracted from the observation of life, from the contradictions and twists of profound transformations, creates the way to new points of reflection, being the privilege of the desire to learn how nature is made. In your mind is born an improbable amalgam: judgments are intertwined with theories and conflicting assumptions collide in a mad dance.

Does the opposition you encounter between personal reality and the unclear taste of endless questions serve the distinction between the significance you attribute to existence and the effect of its final confirmation?

Reconstruction of new value scales, a new power base, a broad vision and mature start from the actual experience of the self and life. And extends up to a priori judgment, namely, torn by experience. Here, science, through the combination of higher significance, is constituted as a cohesion of truths, of reason and views beyond the sphere of experience – measuring the relative importance of different results – with yourself.

Leadership that values unity between man and experience can be summed up as so: to fight hard until you manage to defeat yourself and, finally, to take control of the situation. It is the result of a self-surpassing which is achieved by increasing understanding of impact phenomena; it is the result of thinking that occurs at the contact between experience and a real thread of life that seems detached from another world.

So we could say that this kind of leadership is the result of the science of the power to enter involuntarily into a subtle game of confusions caused by conclusions, observations and analyzes of the "unknowns" of reality, yet drawing curiosity and producing results through the convictions based on choosing from multiple variants of approaching them.

The final confirmation of existence comes as a result of diminishing the intentions of limiting the effects of transition from the certainty of a reality that cannot be extended – to the possibility of surpassing yourself that is accomplished by communicating the truths gained through the revelation of a new world.

The science that broadens your horizon is measured through what you get after you have eliminated the cause of this suite of contradictions and confusions that can distort self-image relative to the subsequently found reality.

The Phenomenology of Science can be associated with the plurality of operations of processing information, a way to collect representations of aspects of abstract reality, and extracting the essence, a feature of thinking that occurs at the contact between experience and the thread of life.

This approach is reflected in the outputs that you generate at each scanning of impact phenomena that can totally change your perspective on life. Practices such as indefinite, contradictions, confusions, paradoxes or antinomies of the finite-infinite type, light and darkness, life and death, old-new, good-evil, truth and lies, etc…