The Phenomenology Of The Value Of Things

Learn to know the "High" function of things so that you use the logic directed towards their knowledge as a solid testimony in support of the formation of a new reasoning.

I wanted to grant myself the freedom to think of things that really concerned me, when the very meaning of their importance and the faith in all that they could cause change in, had a correspondence in day to day life, even if life revealed itself to me as a great mystery. Something strong and alive, applied by the formula Thought + Illusion = Magic, for every value of my identity, from which the fields "discovery" and "meaning" would be obtained, in the meeting point between the amplitude of life and the moment of escape from its screenplay.

Who could have believed me? Who wouldn’t have been tempted to say: so, you dared to believe that you could turn an essential thing, by its importance, into a life meaning? And this meaning, between the limits of what human power does it fit?

It is needless to mention that, in the ways of many that viewed things and even myself, everything seemed an exaggeration, an attempt to recreate the same system of meanings of the experiences that gained new values, a wide use. Things, that same as experiences, vibrate at specific frequencies.

Maybe it was only a figment of imagination of the superconscious that clarified as new meanings were formed. Along with the distinct reason for which I became a universe, part of a whole that acts and thinks in terms of essentials. All only because of the hidden seeds of the mind that, same as drugs, gained solid form after the copulation between matter and energy. But the effect had put absolute domination over my life.

Maybe I wanted to highlight the dimensions of the great futurists’ conception, I thought that such a way of thinking is superior to others.

Who would have tried to understand the state of things that my researched mind tried too early to discern, to be there where things are included within the very value of life, in the direction of a "something" from beyond notion and logic, would have been immediately projected into a world whose existence went by entirely unsuspected. Except everything that was served to him as being a universal truth.

Does your work have the capacity to be the foundation of the real life, or is it a testimony to the "habitual" belonging of things to the right to acquire a new form of conceptualization of your own life experiences?

The work that represents an artist is the image of all the things that surround him, from the customization of the life experience, from the suggestions of a great perspective on creation or the symbolic space of receiving isolated parts of nature.

A work based on the fabrication of universes un-probed by anyone else, containing the balanced combination of science and experience in crafting a meaning of the superior self, has the life of real things. Namely, it consists of the essence of that which you extract from the bond of everything that surrounds you, it is to be, to perceive, to experiment, to search for something truly valuable in the variables involved in the causal chain that influences your way of thinking.

Same as things love and acquired in time, the work is complex and particular. And their study, the shape of functions to be merged, separated and framed in a broader context, the temptation of a retreat of identity becomes ever stronger, as well as the outcome of their adjustment in an area of values and of the meaning attributed to inspiration, it overs us a measure of their consideration and putting them to use.

Can you turn everything around you into a landmark of an artistic creation that invites the viewer into the true universe of the values of a protagonist who offers access to another style of viewing life?

To quote French critic Hippolyte Taine for a moment, that so thoroughly wrote about Balzac: "He was a collector, almost maniacal. He needed wonderful books, antique chairs, precious furniture, of special carved frames, specific paintings. He allowed himself to often be trapped in unpleasant situations due to the desire of obtaining porcelains from Saxa, tapestries and whatnot. His passion for beautiful things resembled a sort of physical itch, it was sooner a sensual desire rather than a noble taste of the spirit."

Leadership begins to take shape where the product of everything that surrounds you is reflected in a realistic plan of development, into a plan of probing and re-organizing of the self, in a more professional manner, in a certain style of thinking. If someone knows the function of things, then they know how to use them to support their own development.

Things become accessories and harmonize exceptionally into a unique whole, into a space filled with potentialities, subjected to an orientation that takes into account the bond between life, work, ambition and art. To turn leadership into a work that rebirths from the things you love, you own or think about, is the greatest quality of an artist, of a man destined to do great things.

The artist inclinations, such as the faculty of discerning information using the aesthetic or hidden dimensions of things, often prove to be synonymous with facilitating the process of conceptualizing their own life experiences.

To conceptualize life experiences means to give a new name and a new meaning to the particular features of surrounding things, fitting them into a vision that does not go beyond their tendency to be a figment of imagination.

The arguments that support the formation of a new vision relate to the perception and interpretation of all forms of expression of creativity consisting of the sum of the things that you have paid attention to up to now and the indulgence of giving them a new meaning in the needs of life.

The Phenomenology Of The Value Of Things can be understood in terms of content and orientation of all things known that, always gravitating around man, create the space necessary for individual liberty to define its training and style of thinking, throughout the work that is accomplished by uniting science with life.

Have you acquired the depth of studying surrounding things? Do these things have the function of stimulating thought and the function of representing yourself in relation with life and science?