The Trajectory Of A Celestial Body

Direct your thinking towards the development of an original creation that is fully in line with the provisions of the science delegated to clarify the elements of manifestation of future concepts.

For now the creation of director Eisenstein isn’t streaming from a systematic thinking, from a precise conception about the art of entertainment. Directing begins to clarify the elements of a future concept. But every step brings after itself, organically, the next one and Eisenstein’s becoming follows a clear, precise, almost calculable line, like the trajectory of a celestial body.

If Parcele would have had an astronomic calculation service, he could have previously drawn the curve of the trajectory for Eisenstein’s destiny. The biographer discovers the perfect geometry of the trajectory: the phenomena are chained as if they had a mathematical logic. And Eisenstein’s initial question begins to have a clear answer. Every fact reflects over the next one, it determines it in a chain reaction – as Eisenstein would say today – whose mechanism is clearly unveiled. *

Can you maneuver an output variable once with the power to understand refined intellectuals, so that your work to shape the virtue of an aesthetic subtlety?

It's said that every step brings with itself, organically, the next one and the becoming of the creator-leader follows a clear, precise, almost calculable line, just like the trajectory of a celestial body. Because the unbeatable perfection can’t be withdrawn from he daily agenda of a huge scale evolution, but it continues to expand through new developments of scientific products, towards segments of users who answer favorably to these innovations.

The Great Science is the inspiration you find in a situation of life or in an imaginary world, reflected in a conception or own statement that must not go beyond the limits of others’ understanding. Before joining the proximity of the great science, you must make up the parts of the plan to conclude an idea (first thought intuitively), then study it from all points of view, and its purpose must be supported by evidence and arguments to be taken in consideration by the world.

Stagecraft art gains aesthetic subtlety only when the dialogue between the visual experience and the reality representation favors the emergence of a form of finesse in the choice of decoration details, as well as a form of elegance in expressing the emotions experienced by the heroes of the story.

Are you determined to conceive a science that’s rich in unknowns, full of intricate secrets? That would mean to activate a rejection option for those not qualified in the field. It’s like you would urge someone to continuously climb 100 floors with a weight on their backs, forgetting that, at any moment, he can fall.

And yet, that’s what the creators of new horizons do, they maneuver once with the power to understand refined intellectuals, an output variable, a scientific pattern of a certain nature, confirmed as scientific truth, with the purpose of directly and personally putting forward an idea, a project, a product or a service. Except the fact that their creation is addressed mainly to producers, distributors and "science" sellers, thus to those at the top of the knowledge pyramid.

With other words, your science has to melt with the logic of innovative judgments that could rise up to the level of an authentic creation, dominated by the high-intellectual-quality factor confirmed only by those truly skilled. And your work can take on the virtue of an art of esthetic subtlety when the ideas and elements that make up a particular theme are evaluated in a depersonalized way, decoupled from you (by the person who develops and shares them).

In relation to the world, what meaning does a creator who is himself the product of an autonomous intellectual creation have?

Even if we understand the meaning of an authentic creation, streaming from the suggestive report between art, science, trend and culture, it is very difficult to see the "landscape" of abandoning everything beyond the essential dimension where the creator-leader evolves. It’s hard to notice at the scholar-leader that "just as it is" in the interaction with science and its attributes – performance, excellence, competition.

Autonomous intellectual creation can be considered as a grand development from a “beginning” to a successful end in terms of guiding ideas to direct the evolution of certain concepts. And a come back to the beginnings of the research activity, turned into a fact by drafting a training schedule and developing an undeliverable product, placed at the service of the future, means a more theoretical knowledge, in the sense of opinion, a specific way to see the world through convictions and concepts.

What we can sense in an artist of transformations of ideas, results and methods, with a somewhat predilection for extreme quality, after he finalized the corresponding cycle for visualizing and developing ways of producing creation, is the trajectory of his professional career. With great difficulty we can only fathom and support his understanding regarding the world.

We can see this type of leader more in terms of some series of schemes and patterns, rebelling against a logical, elementary, systematic, uniform, regular thinking, trying to answer to unsolved questions and to solve the insoluble contradictions of art. But we can never guess the logic behind his reasoning, just as he can never detach from the "universe" he lives in.

Being the product of an autonomous intellectual creation means to assume your wandering destiny in the wonderful lands of science, with the risk of not taking into account the most important aspect of the self-improvement process: the balance between work and time off.

The Trajectory Of A Celestial Body targets the path covered by those who want and make an art out of science, glowing for a long time on the firmament of the future concepts of their own experience and reason.

* Note - Ion Barna - Eisenstein, Youth Publishing House, 1966.