Things (II)

Choose to walk the paths of progress, welcoming your own making in the surrounding things.

I associated myself with the idea of integrating myself in the beginning of a great day, from which, with no explanation, the characteristic nothingness of a fleeting moment in which only things showed their hidden faces could be subtracted, and the proclaimed certainties faded like candles that go out at once, without anyone blowing on them. It was a kind of gaining confidence in a world that is difficult to access, in a space of subjective conspiracy, in the context of the freedom of association between elements of sense and non-sense, so that the position around the immense ego and my work with it cannot be changed by the play of the ambiguous metamorphoses of the symbolic and the real.

What I thought was happening to me, at the shelter of a consciousness that could only explain its reality through the key of a time that became a revealer of true states of things, within the depths of a mysterious calling for a detachment from everything inert, towards the symbolic forms of the Unknown, was in fact the continuation of a journey towards a fulfillment that refused its absolute.

The making of a shift in the perception of things is done through the apparition of a rupture in their natural order. A sort of penetration into the essence of a whole, vibrating at different frequencies of realism, with multiple sub-meanings attributed to the erosions suffered by the values that give life meaning, through an abusive use of everything the surrounding world gives. And the distinction between reality and illusion, between the imagined things and the allegorized things, under the formal aspect of the enigmatic associations, generating multiple meanings, lies in the intensity of the expression of some feelings that come to the surface through words.

Are you ready to create an imaginative space for yourself, full of visuals, displaying interpretations of a part of reality that transmits emotions from which you cannot escape?

At the shelter of the hermetic secret, in the alchemical research he would conduct in parallel with physics research, Newton had entered a new world. In the face of its furnaces, he contemplated the "birth" of substances, the combination of masculine seeds with feminine ones, the reciprocal manifestations of bodies. Through Transformation, causing a lot of reaction, which was an oversupply of information, such a combination could bring about a bonus to the Great Science. But, at the same time, it could bring about a ray of new light to its own nature, to its own reality.

This is what happens when science combines with the esoteric: the emotions of discovering new things that may be forbidden to the general public intensify to the level at which you are forced to pay attention to them. Practically, these emotions can be in a clear interaction with the strange play of the associations between the concrete and abstract terms, being influenced by certain non-emotions, that is, by a thought, by a memory or by an image.

My research on the reciprocal manifestations of bodies were subordinate to the idea of exposing myself without fear to a different form of existence, corresponding to a different characteristic of my being: I always substituted myself to a private initiative, that of continuing to seek what I always forgot would change completely. It could be said that I lived with an intensity that surpassed the power of perception of the banal. It was all the more difficult for me to leave the emotions of "Eureka" that fed my reality.

Do you keep looking for what you always forget changes completely, or are you trying to change everything before you notice what eludes you?

What changes completely are not things, but rather the state they trigger. The placing of things between the Ego that needs occasional challenges, majorly defining the anchors of your identity in relation to life, and the context in which you realize that you depend on that limited resource that makes you go forward. This resource is called: power of choice.

Instead of focusing on a fulfillment whose first essence includes the idea of achieving performance in a certain field, we should rather observe the ways in which we can fulfill our need of exploring what surrounds us, based on the idea that for our infinite achievement the infinite presence of things is also strictly necessary.

Trying to make a big change in the reality you perceive in your daily experiences, before you notice what eludes you in the order in which things are placed, is similar to painting an apple tree without thoroughly analyzing its taste. It means to be concerned about an idea that is seemingly interesting, but in its essence is poor from the lack of subtlety and emotional load.

Things are goods, bodies, values, products of a world from which unknown universes are created, if you relate to them through the state of mind they create, through the emotion conveyed, through the curiosity sparked, proving themselves to be mentors that help you in various situations, guiding you in the process of creating your own world.

Or, to quote the great Romanian writer Alexandru Busuioceanu: "Things exist. Their achievement is within me however, same as my own achievement is within them. From the shadow of the world will always spring identity and this adversity, an eternal creator of new identities: Me and things. Behold, for I am the one creating the Universe.

Nothing from what is visible or invisible is born in any other way than from this contact between myself with what I am not, everything reabsorbed into the relative hallucination of things. And if one would be absent, the other would be absent all the same. For each one faces within the other its own achievement."

Are you on the side of things whose value gets lost through constant use, or on the side of things whose value you are aware of only when you lose them?

The expansion of understanding existence, the way through which a guiding realization can be achieved, is done through the invisible force behind all tangible things, which, by anchoring itself in the correspondent of the inner world offers a great deal of non-monotony, curiosity.

Personality is related to what is reflected within, reacting to what you receive from the outside, without letting yourself be overwhelmed or deceived by those precarious states of mind that make you abnormally curious about any nonsense.

Your achievement as a man of great originality depends not only on the quality of things you create, but rather on what side of things you are.

Are you on the side of things whose mastery dares to be refused? On the side of those things whose intense beauty inspires you and makes you think? Or on the side of those things you see with different eyes before putting them in their place?

To what extent do they influence your way of manifesting your personality?

Leadership is the personality you can win in the context of sorting things that never prove the same during "the course of life".